Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section - it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Voyager 1
Voyager 1

Glossary[edit]

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps[edit]

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually - a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers[edit]

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...[edit]

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...[edit]

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives[edit]

April 24[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Donald Payne Jr.[edit]

Article: Donald Payne Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Not ready yet. Being worked on. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Solomon Islands general election[edit]

Article: 2024 Solomon Islands general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Manasseh Sogavare retains his seat as Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands but his party does not claim a majority in the Parliament in the 2024 Solomon Islands general election. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian Al Jazeera
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Staraction (talk | contribs) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Good quality and well-updated. The Kip 18:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's usually a section after "Results" that deals with aftermath or reactions; that's as yet missing. Otherwise, this is looking good. Schwede66 21:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza mass graves[edit]

Article: Gaza mass graves (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Several mass graves with hundreds of bodies have been found in Gaza. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Reuters, The Guardian, NY Times, AP News, CNN, France 24, FT, Al Jazeera
Credits:

Ainty Painty (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, covered by ongoing Israel–Hamas war. Angusgtw (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as part of ongoing, hasn't changed any aspect of what's been happening there to a great degree. --Masem (t) 12:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above, as tragic as it is, we can't post every human rights violation happening there or ITN would be full of them. Also, what is "Gaedgza"? Is it a variant spelling of Gaza, a spelling error, or a more specific place? Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Striking my vote, the scale of the human rights violation makes it pretty unprecedented, and exceptions to Ongoing can and should be made. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 14:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it is a part of the Israel/Hamas war LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This human rights violation barely got any coverage by the war article, compared by how notable this is Abo Yemen 14:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To little information at this time - we don’t know when these people were killed or the circumstances of their death. It’s possible that these were buried before Israel raided the compounds. In addition, covered by ongoing. BilledMammal (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose/Wait more or less per BilledMammal. I'm not totally convinced this would be covered in Ongoing, but the article is missing a lot of context, particularly the "who" and the "why", which is really important when we're talking about what could be a war crime. I went "oppose/wait" because this is an item worth revisiting, but any investigation will probably take some time to complete. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait per DarkSide - I'm on the fence whether this supersedes the ongoing item or not, but the fog of war is still in effect around it and the article feels woefully underdeveloped. The Kip 18:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait - I would like to see more clarity about what happened before posting. Blythwood (talk) 19:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait. Two graves are yet to be exhumed, and details surrounding the burials are still being reported on. Jebiguess (talk) 20:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Abdul Aleem Farooqui[edit]

Article: Abdul Aleem Farooqui (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ETV Bharat, Amar Ujala
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Indian Islamic scholar. Khaatir (talk) 07:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fairly good article The AP (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - it's a good article and a notable person LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support there are no apparent issues with the article. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 23[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections


RD: Frank Field, Baron Field of Birkenhead[edit]

Article: Frank Field, Baron Field of Birkenhead (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Labour minister.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conditional support (after sourcing issues are fixed); looks comprehensive! Staraction (talk | contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it is comprehensive. But, unfortunately, at least five paragraphs currently have no citations. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose some paragraphs do not have any sourcing. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is fine. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia–Azerbaijan border demarcation[edit]

Article: Armenia–Azerbaijan border (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Armenia and Azerbaijan begin demarcating their common border, simultaneously placing the first boundary markers as a step towards a peace agreement. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ After Armenia announces handing over four abandoned villages to Azerbaijan, the two countries begin demarcating their common border, simultaneously placing the first boundary markers as a step towards a peace agreement.
News source(s): France 24 The Guardian
Credits:

Armenia and Azerbaijan are working together for a peace agreement, apparently! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support – Great news and a good-looking article. I think the update to the article may be a bit minimal for a blurb. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 10:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I can write a bit more! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Added a bit more about the details of the deal, including protests in Armenia in response to territories being handed over. Sadly, it is not yet clear where the first boundary markers were placed. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose an important start, but this doesn't read as any formalized treaty or equivalent, only they're starting to survey what the boundary likely should be which they will then be the basis of the peace agreement. --Masem (t) 12:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do think this could be ITN worthy, but what would go a long way to facilitating such a nom is a page on the demarcation itself, which should be feasible given the scope of this event. Not voting either way at this current moment though. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait(?) per Darkside. ITN-worthy topic IMO, given the prior intensity and long-lasting nature of the conflict, but needs a better target article. The Kip 18:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis but it's not in the best state right now. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 18:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Helen Vendler[edit]

Article: Helen Vendler (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Boston Globe
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American literary critic. Needs some work.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Bibliography section needs more sources. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Terry Carter[edit]

Article: Terry Carter (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American actor and filmmaker.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is a major orange tag, Selected projects section needs to be rewritten with sources and Awards section needs sourcing. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 22[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Science and technology

  • NASA announces that it has received decipherable data from the Voyager 1 space probe for the first time in five months. (CNN)

RD: Joel Breman[edit]

Article: Joel Breman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

NY Times obit published 22 April. Thriley (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support the article is sufficiently sourced. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Voyager 1 contact resumed[edit]

Article: Voyager 1 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: NASA announces receiving decipherable data from Voyager 1 for the first time in five months. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Over five months, NASA resolves a failure in Voyager 1's flight data system and resumes receiving decipherable data from the probe.
Alternative blurb II: ​ After five months of attempts, NASA resolves a failure in Voyager 1's flight data system, and receives decipherable data from the space probe again.
News source(s): NASA JPL CNN
Credits:

Article updated

After rearranging code from a defective Voyager 1 chip, NASA is finally getting back data from the furthest probe in the Solar System! Honestly, it's a little miracle that they managed to save the half-century old probe. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 08:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Significant, and a nice departure from our normal doom and gloom and elections. BilledMammal (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Just heard about this on radio news in Australia. An impressive feat. HiLo48 (talk) 08:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Notable, and the article is of sufficiently good quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per above, and of particular interest due to the ingenuity of humankind. Kcmastrpc (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support though I don't think the blurb is really sufficient. First off we don't need to say "NASA announces..." but thats minor, there's something to be said that they had been troubleshooting V1 for the last five months (over that great distance and with age of the computer) to resolve that. --Masem (t) 12:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Added altblurb, what do you think of it? Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have simplified Alt1 down but that I think is more reasonable. --Masem (t) 12:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Great, thanks! Alt2 (my own attempt at simplifying) probably isn't needed then. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - well-written and In the News. Great find! Staraction (talk | contribs) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Interesting and great news! mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Always nice to see more science news pop up in ITN, especially in regards to one of the most ambitious space exploration programs in history. ArkHyena (talk) 17:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT1 per above. Science! The Kip 18:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 19:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Brian Tobin (tennis)[edit]

Article: Brian Tobin (tennis) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Associated Press
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

President of the International Tennis Federation.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support the article meets bare minimum requirement. PrinceofPunjabTALK 15:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Cecil Williams[edit]

Article: Cecil Williams (pastor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): KQED
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American pastor and civil rights activist. Funcrunch (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support. Williams' death has received very little coverage outside San Francisco; nevertheless he was a pretty relevant figure in the civil rights movement and I could see a case being made for this RD. Support I have just been informed that the above information is irrelevant to this discussion. Thank you. In that case, everything else looks good to me. Poxy4 (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Poxy4 Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD. The only thing to discuss is if the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - reason is the same as above, it meets quality standards LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Lead needs at least a sentence or two more on his notability.—Bagumba (talk) 07:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bagumba: expanded as well as I could from article prose. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 21[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections


RD: Jerome Rothenberg[edit]

Article: Jerome Rothenberg (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Jacket2.org; Zeta Tijuana
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

This poet, anthologist, translator and interpreter has been a fundamental American literary voice for 60+ years. His book Technicians of the Sacred is a classic. But this article’s RD status is not ready, and has been tagged since 2012. Note: this is listed under April 23 b/c that’s the earliest, credibly sourced date available in English confirming Rothenberg’s death (tho a source in Spanish was dated April 22, and social media reported it hours after his passing on April 21). Trauma Novitiate (talk) 04:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Sri Lankan Fox Hill Supercross race crash[edit]

Article: 2024 Fox Hill Supercross race crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A car crash in a motorsporting event in Sri Lanka leaves seven people dead. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated

It has been the news headline due to the significance of the return of the said motorsport event in Sri Lanka after five years. Abishe (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose - this is worthy, however, the page still has a long way to go for polishing and wiki linking before it should be added LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - well cited and seems notable Abo Yemen 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – I've posted my concerns about WP:NPOV on the article's talk page. Schwede66 21:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Michael Cuscuna[edit]

Article: Michael Cuscuna (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WRTI
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Fairly short Mach61 02:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose article do not have {{Infobox person}} and the awards section is unsourced. PrinceofPunjabTALK 04:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PrinceofPunjab Both of those issues have been resolved Mach61 13:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support looks just about long enough to post, and everything looks sourced. Note that having an infobox is not an article or ITN requirement, as per MOS:INFOBOXUSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - article is short but seems just long enough to post mike_gigs talkcontribs 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article is short on biographical detail. The WRTI source has a lot of content that could make this a much better bio. Schwede66 21:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Terry A. Anderson[edit]

Article: Terry A. Anderson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ReutersThe New York Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Held hostage in Lebanon.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 01:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose due to a large amount of unsourced text in the hostage in Lebanon section. And just a reminder that notability does not matter for RD's. Gödel2200 (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As WP:ITNQUALITY notes, Articles should be well referenced; one or two "citation needed" tags may not hold up an article, but any contentious statements must have a source, and having entire sections without any sources is unacceptable. Overall the article is well referenced. And I added several references to address one of them. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I removed the cn-tagged paragraph after questioning its relevance to Anderson himself, so should be good to go now mike_gigs talkcontribs 17:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are a few {cn} tags in the Post-captivity life section. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan–Pakistan floods[edit]

Article: 2024 Afghanistan–Pakistan floods (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 130 people died in floods in Afghanistan and Pakistan. (Post)
News source(s): NY Times, CNN, VOA, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, CBS, DW, Washington Post, BBC
Credits:

Ainty Painty (talk) 03:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support in principal but the article needs a little bit of expansion. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Andrew and a combined blurb. The AP (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment With articles (some of which I think we've blurbed previously) like 2023 Pakistan floods, 2023 Afghanistan floods, 2022 Pakistan floods, 2022 Afghanistan floods, 2021 Afghan floods, etc. it's hard to see how this is even notable, let alone blurb-worthy. Nfitz (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Its only notable because it is a continuation of the rain and flooding that hit the Middle East, hence while that one system should be a single article and covered that way. Regular seasonal flooding of that area that comes from normal storm patterns may be appropriate for ongoing once that season starts, but we shouldn't be posting regular annual weather aspects otherwise. Masem (t) 19:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CheetasOnMission (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose there's an ongoing merge discussion. If merged, then blurb should be updated, and if not merged, then this event on its own isn't ITN worthy (and the article is questionably notable on its own anyway). Joseph2302 (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 20[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Andrew Davis (conductor)[edit]

Proposed image
Article: Andrew Davis (conductor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Famous conductor Andrew🐉(talk) 12:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Andrew, thank you for nominating. Next time, please under the day of death, and yes for updated only when done (not yet).There's a lot about contracts, and little music, and refs missing for the recordings, also there must be more, no? He held chief positions in three continents! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Now everything mentioned also has a source. I can't fix the note on the article talk to here, sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article looks good. One cn tag, but that shouldn't keep this from getting posted. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Now sourced. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks good. Well sourced. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 19:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Lourdes Portillo[edit]

Article: Lourdes Portillo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): IndieWire, Los Angeles Times, Variety, Deadline Hollywood
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Mexican filmmaker and activist. 240F:7A:6253:1:DBD:7A2C:458C:FE69 (talk) 07:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Howie Schwab[edit]

Article: Howie Schwab (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

240F:7A:6253:1:DBD:7A2C:458C:FE69 (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose We don't post stubs. Schwede66 00:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • With merely 208 words of prose, this stubby wikibio needs an expansion to qualify. --PFHLai (talk) 03:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's at 1960 B (323 words).—Bagumba (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's on the short side but ok. Once the two citation needed tags are gone, I'd say it's good enough to post. Schwede66 21:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Roman Gabriel[edit]

Article: Roman Gabriel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Needs a lot of work. Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: can you work on this? Natg 19 (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I was just thinking about doing that. I probably should be able to do it soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gediminas Kirkilas[edit]

Article: Gediminas Kirkilas (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Needs some work. Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the article needs so much expansion. There are just 3 lines covering his premiership. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kunwar Sarvesh Kumar Singh[edit]

Article: Kunwar Sarvesh Kumar Singh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Needs some work. Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the article needs more sourcing. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 19[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Bill Tobin (American football)[edit]

Article: Bill Tobin (American football) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

NFL executive.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait there is no obvious issue here, but the career section needs some expansion and early life section could use a bit more referencing. PrinceofPunjabTALK 12:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No mention of playing career in body, just unsourced details in lead and infobox, even if he is most notable as executive. Here's a source for a sentence or two,[5] which should be sufficient.—Bagumba (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Leighton James[edit]

Article: Leighton James (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former Wales footballer. Lead needs expansionPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support the article is in a good shape. Only problem is that the last two lines of Club career section needs sourcing. PrinceofPunjabTALK 12:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three {cn} tags remaining. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 03:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Daniel Dennett[edit]

Article: Daniel Dennett (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American philosopher.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article looks good to me - went to add it here myself and got edit-conflicted. --Opus 113 (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support there is one cn tag but that should not hold this article from getting posted. PrinceofPunjabTALK 12:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too many unreferenced paragraphs. Stephen 05:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    At his point, it's two unsourced sentences tagged. —Bagumba (talk) 06:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've tagged a lot more unreferenced stuff. And the citation style where his works are referred to in the prose, with the citation just giving page numbers, is also not up to scratch. Schwede66 20:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Francis Omondi Ogolla[edit]

Article: Francis Omondi Ogolla (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Ainty Painty (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is one cn tag and the last line of death section is not sourced. It would be better if reactions section is merged with the death one and replace a tweet source with a better one. PrinceofPunjabTALK 12:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing : 2024 United States presidential election[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2024 United States presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chinese coverage, British coverage,Indian coverage, African coverage, Qatari coverage
Credits:

Article updated

Alright. There is a large scale interest in this election, not even just in the US but also in European countries and India. Elections have been posted to ongoing before and I believe this would be beneficial to Wikipedia. Lukt64 (talk)

Oppose - Unlike India, the election isn't "ongoing", a campaign that's still going to last more than half a year is. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The general election is already WP:ITNR and I don't see how any other events would be ITN worthy (aside from a theoretical Trump conviction, which wouldn't really be covered by the election article anyway). Estreyeria (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - In India, the voting stages have begun. In a UK election, parliament would be dissolved a set time before the election. The US election just isn't 'ongoing' in either of these senses. It's many months away, and the party conferences haven't even happened. The US electoral process is absurdly protracted, but let's not get way ahead of ourselves. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose seriously no. There is no argument to support this nomination. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2024 Indian general election (ongoing)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2024 Indian general election (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, The Times of India, The Guardian
Credits:
Nominator's comments: This is world’s biggest election in the world's most populous country. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose we don't generally post elections onto ongoing. Also, there's about 1 election a week, so it's unlikely that there will be significant updates every 1-2 days, which is a requirement for ongoing. The article itself has no prose updates to even say election started. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Joseph.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - We have posted elections into ongoing before - For example we put the 2020 U.S. elections in ongoing, mainly due to the long vote count that took place. India is the most populous country in the world, nearly 1 Billion people are eligible to vote. The election is massively in the news, its organisation itself being notable as this is the largest democratic vote held in human history. Absolutely deserves to be ongoing for the duration of it. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Only problem is that ongoing is massively clogged at the moment. My personal opinion is to take off Myanmar and Sudan, while merging the Red Sea Crisis into a 'Spillover' item. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not nearly the only problem. This is a contentious topic which will tend to attract campaigners seeking to influence the outcome. DYK embargoes election coverage for 30 days ahead of the poll -- see WP:DYKELECT. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's DYK, not ITN. Even then, no election candidates are in this item. How would this rule apply here? We've posted many contentious topics that were even more controversial than this PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Elections are ongoing in the UK – I'm getting leaflets and canvassing currently. And the US has its presidential election and whatever else. Politics is endlessly ongoing everywhere, it seems. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Andrew I think it is wrong to compare these elections with UK or US elections. Next United Kingdom general election have no fixed date in sight, we do not know whether the voting will take place next month or the next year. 2024 United States presidential election will take place on November 5th. I put this up for nomination today because official voting have started from today even though the campaign for these have been going on from the start of the year. PrinceofPunjabTALK 09:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Voting hasn't begun in the UK yet. India is such a massive and populous country that it takes a month for everyone in the country to vote. Here's an interesting video about it . 1/8th of the world is voting in this election, nuts PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That video is four years old because this protracted process is not new; it was much the same last time. ITN posted the results at the end in the usual way. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The FIFA World Cup has happened before even more regularly, yet we put it in ongoing. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    FIFA is explicitly stated for ongoing and outcome blurb entries in WP:ITN/R, and it was perhaps by its entry in ITN/R that allowed it to be posted as ongoing despite what could had been a no consensus close in the last discussion. Going by ITN/R, only the election results will be posted. If you have issues with FIFA getting an ongoing entry, it can be discussed on the talk page. – robertsky (talk) 14:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    With FIFA, there's ongoing results as matches are played and teams eliminated. So there is "result" news happening every week FIFA is going. With elections, the "result" news is typically when the election is over and reported, so it is normally just a singular blurb. Masem (t) 15:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew, that's disingenuous. The current UK election period is for local elections and one single parliamentary by-election. The Indian election is a general election. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have a general election coming too. That has had an article for over four years and it has averaged more than one edit every day throughout that period. It's in the news often and its readership is comparable with the South Korean election that we're currently blurbing. Such politics is ongoing all the time here. It might be nice to live a country which doesn't have party politics. But then there's the weather per our current lead blurb... Andrew🐉(talk) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It should be noted that this is not the election campaign, but the election itself that is taking place over several months, unlike in places like the US. Also, the results progressively coming from each phase of the election mean we might have significant updates every few days. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the world's largest democracy is holding a election that is biggest in the human history and it is regularly getting large number of page views. LiamKorda 10:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't what ongoing is for. When the election results are announced, they'll certainly be notable enough for a blurb, but there are unlikely to be a sufficiently high number of updates, as per Joseph. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Putting any election into ongoing is a bad use of it. If we put India's, we clearly have to put the US's because of how important this one is, and that starts a slipperly slope for all election seasons. We will absolutely post the results (assuming the article is good). To add that adding the unknown factors in the 2020 US election after election day into ongoing made sense, since at that point the news cycle was not about campaigning any more but all the legal challenges to the vote. Should the Indian election turn that way after the campaigning is over, leaving a major question of who won, then that might also be worth ongoing. But in the pre-voting period, the bulk of the news is all about campaigns, and that's something we shouldn't give attention to at ITN. --Masem (t) 12:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, we're not in the pre-voting period. The vote started today, and lasts a whole month. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it is different to other countries as the voting is over a longer period of time (not one day like most other country elections, and a few days for EU elections). Nevertheless, the article doesn't meet the criteria of WP:ONGOING: In general, articles are not posted to ongoing merely because they are related to events that are still happening. In order to be posted to ongoing, the article needs to be regularly updated with new, pertinent information. There are no recent regular updates on this article at present, and these regular updates would need to be maintained throughout the election period to keep it on ongoing if posted. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    When will the votes be tallied? During the voting period or after its over? If they aren't being tallied over this month, then this is still in the campaigning phase, and we can wait to post the results. — Masem (t) 15:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A country having general elections in most cases isn't newsworthy unless the country is new to the democratic process, or returning from an undemocractic one (even then, this would have been events separate from the elections). India having month-long elections is a procedural one designed for its circumstances. Is it noteworthy, yes, news worthy? No. However, if there is/are (touch wood) major disruptions to the election process, we can consider them for blurb(s). Also to note that the 2019 elections generated... one nomination. – robertsky (talk) 15:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per all above. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose As per the election schedule section of the article, voting will be taking place with around one week breaks, meaning there will not be enough updates for this to go in ongoing. Gödel2200 (talk) 16:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even though India is the biggest democracy, we only post the results of the election TheAstorPastor (talk) 16:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. Regardless of the amount of people voting in this election, I don't think we should post anything about it until the winner of the election is announced (unless a major disruption occurs, per above, but we will cross that bridge if we ever come to it). Moncoposig (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Israeli retaliation (ongoing)[edit]

Article: 2024 Iran–Israel conflict (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN Al Jazeera
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Still breaking, but MSM is both reporting and mentioning israel and iran. You may remove oil prices, but i just screenshotted it on my phone and is almost 3% up. User:37.252.95.10

  • Support but needs its own separate article when official info is ready. 142.117.133.114 (talk) 02:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We should try to wait until we have confirmation what actually happened, beyond reports of explosions. That said, if we're going to have this tit-for-tat conflict here, that's probably where one page summarizing these events as a whole are needed, not individual articles for each attack. (This is a long-standing NOTNEWS problem). Masem (t) 02:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like olympics or other events, could be ongoing. Would need a chronology article. Do you thinking ongoing is better than a bump? There is going to be a counter from iran too. (speculative on my end, i admit, but chronology still adds up since its all inside a week).37.252.95.10 (talk) 02:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming we get a decent article covering the 2024 Israeli - Iranian Crisis, I'd probably support this as an ongoing item. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the original article doesn't even consolidate Iranian seizure of the MSC Aries. Clearly they are related.37.252.95.10 (talk) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that the reports are that this was a single strike at a site near an Iranian nuclear facility, this is absolutely better suited for an ongoing item on the conflict than an individual article. — Masem (t) 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hear (not substantiated yet) there was a strike on some outpost in Syria and something in Iraq. Probs more reason for ongoing. If anyone wants to create that page.37.252.95.10 (talk) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the newsbox above has this 2024 Iran–Israel conflict. Maybe ill convert this to an ongoing thing.37.252.95.10 (talk) 04:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
done.37.252.95.10 (talk) 04:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update the existing blurb about the previous strikes. When that scrolls off, we can consider Ongoing if the tit for tat is continuing. In any case, we need more clarity and confirmation as "Officials are saying there has been no attack...". Andrew🐉(talk) 08:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update and put it in Ongoing when that rolls off. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 09:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Ongoing—The situation is evolving dramatically by the day, and has two of the most powerful countries in the Middle East at the brink of all-out war. If any conflict merits an Ongoing, it's this one. Kurtis (talk) 10:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Red Sea into Spillover - Very notable event, but would be best to merge with the Red Sea Crisis item into one 'spillover' of the Hamas War. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The conflict in the Red Sea is still ongoing as long as it is having an impact on shipping and economic activities. If the ships have started to use the channel normally then the spillover link can be removed. This conflict is only more notable than the Yemen conflict because of the disruption to shipping.
    Shironese (talk) 14:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Waiting until the entire conflict ends to take the item off is an arbitrary metric, conflicts often last for decades without any major events. Best to merge PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The events of this conflict can be adequately covered in ongoing by either the Spillover of the Israel-Hamas war article, or the Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (12 January 2024 – present) article, one if which (preferably the latter, IMO) seems to have consensus to replace the Red Sea crisis item in ongoing with. Gödel2200 (talk) 16:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, if we're going to post it then let's post it independently, it is not a part of red sea crisis or any other ongoing news, it's a separate event with loose connection to other ongoing wars. 3000MAX (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - both sides have said it's over. The pundits seem to agree. That seems to be the opposite of ongoing to me. And is the final volley of 3 missiles even notable? If it ever happened - Iran is saying it didn't even happen! How many different countries has Iran fired missiles at recently ... Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, Isreal ... did I miss any? Nfitz (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's true. If there's any further engagement between the two countries then we can re-review, but the situation seems to have cooled down PrecariousWorlds (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - as Nfitz said, both sides said it's over. Fileyfood500 (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as it is spill over from a conflict already listed as ongoing. Yakikaki (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - As Chamberlain might say, we missed the bus. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 18[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Sports


Vasuki indicus (Reviewers needed)[edit]

Article: Vasuki indicus (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Vasuki indicus, possibly the largest known snake, is formally described. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Vasuki indicus, possibly the largest known snake at 10.9–15.2 metres (36–50 feet) long, is formally described.
News source(s): Scientific Reports, AP News, CNN, CBS News
Credits:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaylockjam10 (talkcontribs) 07:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support although, unlike Ichthyotitan, it should be noted that the length estimates overlap heavily with Titanoboa, with only the higher estimates making it the largest. Either way, this really seems to be the giant fossil season and I'm all for it! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 08:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uncertainty is why I wrote possibly in the blurb. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mandisa[edit]

Article: Mandisa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Fox News
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American gospel and contemporary Christian recording artist.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there are several paragraphs ending without a reference, multiple cn tags and the Awards section is unsourced. PrinceofPunjabTALK 13:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the article subject's death is notable and newsworthy as it has been covered by news sources worldwide. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD. This vote doesn't take that into account in any way. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dickey Betts[edit]

Article: Dickey Betts (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Guitarist for The Allman Brothers Band. 240F:7A:6253:1:A1DE:A47F:63DC:BD77 (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is an orange tag and several cn tags. PrinceofPunjabTALK 17:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2024 Croatian parliamentary election[edit]

Article: 2024 Croatian parliamentary election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The HDZ-led coalition wins a plurality of votes in the parliamentary election in Croatia but fall well short of a parliamentary majority. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: As always with these elections it'll be now coalition negotiation time, but the main news is HDZ won but maybe not as by much as they would like. A slightly bigger aftermath and commentary on the results would be nice, but it's not a bad article at all. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as it is under ITN/R LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is virtually no prose in the "results" and "aftermath" sections. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chaotic Enby: how about now, since both have been expanded? Abcmaxx (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, count me as support then! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Admin comment I'm willing to post this once meaningful prose has been added to the "Results" section. Please ping me when it's done. Schwede66 19:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Schwede66: I have expanded it significantly, although it's difficult not to overlap with the aftermath section. Abcmaxx (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cool. I’ll be out for the next 6 or 8 hours. If another admin wants to have a look in the meantime, that will be good as well. Schwede66 21:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted and apologies for the delay in getting onto it. Schwede66 20:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 17[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) Ichthyotitan[edit]

Proposed image
Article: Ichthyotitan (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ichthyotitan (pictured), the largest marine reptile ever known, is formally described. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Ichthyotitan (pictured), the largest marine reptile ever known, measuring around 25 metres (82 ft) long, is formally described.
Alternative blurb II: Ichthyotitan (pictured), possibly the largest marine reptile ever known at around 25 metres (82 ft) long, is formally described.
News source(s): Peer-reviewed article in PLoS One The Guardian CNN
Credits:

Article updated

What about a scientific discovery, to change a bit from the wars, politics and disasters? A new species of ichthyosaur of absolutely gigantic proportions, nearly as big as a blue whale and possibly still growing at the time of death. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 08:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – Hell yeah, back to our encyclopedia roots. However, there is a lot of insecurity about whether or not it actually would be the longest ever. I don't think we can make such a certain claim in our lede. The article could use some expansion too I think. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Down to help with the expansion part! Just added an altblurb for the "possibly" thing. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 08:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I expanded the article quite a lot, it should be fine now. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh beautiful work! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose 1. Paleontology is a science where facts (especially animal size) are changing all the time with new discoveries and new analysis from other researcher. 2. It's only partial skeleton (heck, there is only jawbones), scientist speculate all the time so it's not really newsworthy Afif Brika1 (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    While the size was given with a margin of error, it's not fair to say that it is only speculation—all of science changes in light of new evidence, that doesn't mean we shouldn't have scientific news on ITN. The bones found are very much larger than those of Shastasaurus sikanniensis, its cousin and predecessor as record-holder. Plus, the news is the discovery (being formally published), not just scientists making a new length estimate. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with Chaotic Enby. This is more than just a theory or hypothesis, this a scientific discovery backed by evidence. Unless someone proves otherwise, then these are the current set of facts. The earth was verifiably flat until it was proven it definitely was not and the sun revolved round it, until it was proven it was the other way round etc. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    What an utterly bizarre comment. Black Kite (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support scientific discoveries like these should be posted. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - already a B-class article and seems notable Abo Yemen 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is fine. This is the sort of thing we should be featuring. Black Kite (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Peer-reviewed finding covered in news, and article looks fine. --Masem (t) 19:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Fine article, important discovery. Yakikaki (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 05:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You beat me to it by a few minutes. :-) Schwede66 05:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And User:Spencer protected the picture, so he was on the ball too! Stephen 05:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support Just wanted to say I was very happy when I went to Wikipedia today and saw this on the main page. I hope we start posting things like this more often, ITN has the potential to be so much more than just a bullet-point list of horrible tragedies. Glad to see many others feel the same way. Great idea nominating this & many thanks to the editors worked on the article!  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 23:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks a lot! I'll try to nominate and write more of these if I find about them! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support Agreeing with Vanilla Wizard. Good to see some none-tragic news hitting the headlines at Wikipedia. ITN could benefit from more stories like this getting blurbed (scientific achievements, etc.) --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Sue Chew[edit]

Article: Sue Chew (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://idahocapitalsun.com/2024/04/18/longest-serving-democrat-in-idaho-legislature-dies-from-pancreatic-cancer/
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

American politician, Member of the Idaho House of Representatives. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is no information about her political career and otherwise have very little prose. PrinceofPunjabTALK 13:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The article is practically a stub. Schwede66 19:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Austin Murphy[edit]

Article: Austin Murphy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Observer-Reporter
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former U.S. representative from Pennsylvania. The article needs work but the linked news article reporting his death has a lot of details which can be added. Curbon7 (talk) 22:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Article needs some ref work and there's little information about his political career, especially his tenure his congress (besides the extensive info about scandals). Nothing about committee assigns or anything other besides his scandals are mentioned. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I've placed three citation needed tags. Schwede66 19:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Persian Gulf floods[edit]

Article: 2024 Persian Gulf floods (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Floods in the Gulf states killed 18 people in Oman, while the United Arab Emirates experienced its heaviest rainfall in 75 years. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Flooding in the Gulf states leaves 20 people dead.
News source(s): NY Times, Al Jazeera, Reuters, The Guardian, Khaleej Times, BBC,
Credits:

Ainty Painty (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support The event is notable and the article seems to be of sufficiently good quality and sourcing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle. 'Heavy rainfall in the Gulf states' had been an excellent example of an oxymoron before this happened.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. 10 inches of rain poured in 24 hours in parts of the UAE, highest since Emirati climate records began in 1949! Unprecedented in a normally arid part of the world. Droodkin (talk) 10:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle but the article is currently a bit small and needs to be expanded. PrinceofPunjabTALK 10:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle, oppose on quality seeding has already been dismissed as the cause, this was just a very unusual storm pattern that caused flooding. The BG section of the article doesn't mention the weather system at all and focuses too much on the seeding part. Masem (t) 15:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, unique meteorological event with a major impact. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 17:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability Abo Yemen 18:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support a rare and notable weather event --Μιχαήλ Δεληγιάννης (talk) 22:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, oppose on quality some places got 2-3 times their annual rainfall in a matter of hours, and the 2nd largest airport in the world was closed. However, article is orange tagged, which needs fixing. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article looks quite a bit better now, so changing vote to support. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Article still fails to explain the fundamental weather system that caused the rainfall and focuses too much if seeding and long term climate change. Our weather disaster articles nearly always dip into details about the weather systems that lead to these disasters. Masem (t) 18:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 02:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blurb is wrong, there have been floodings in yemen too (which is not a gulf state) and a person died there. Maybe change it to the statesof Arabian peninsula or something close to that Abo Yemen 08:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Iran is not in the Arabian peninsula though, and the floods do not cover the whole Middle East either. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Arabian Peninsula != Middle east
    Just change it to "the states of the Arabian Peninsula and Iran" Abo Yemen 15:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Stephen: The blurb is incorrect. Currently, the blurb states “Flooding in the Arab Gulf states leaves at least twenty-four people dead.” This is factually incorrect as Iran has had eight casualties and is not one of the Arab states of the Persian Gulf. The blurb should instead state “Flooding in the Persian Gulf leaves at least thirty-two people dead.” --Bijanii (talk) 23:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • With the fatality in Yemen now, it could also state “Flooding in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Peninsula leaves more than thirty people dead.” The current blurb - “Flooding in the Arab Gulf states leaves more than thirty people dead.” - is still incorrect and needs to be changed. --Bijanii (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Chernihiv missile attack[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: April 2024 Chernihiv missile strike (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A missile attack kills 17 people in Chernihiv, Ukraine, while more than 60 people are injured. (Post)
News source(s): BBC Al Jazeera Reuters The Guardian Washington Post ABC News Kyiv Independent NY Times
Credits:
NYMan6 (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: